Nasty free chat lines l Live free sex chat no sign up no pay
Their efforts became public in the interest of transparency and in the interest of sending important messages--a message such as showing that prominent folks won’t get special treatment in our courts, a message that creates a deterrent for other would-be child molesters, a message that encourages other sex crime victims to step forward.Those messages were outlined by Zahnd in his defense testimony. Tell me again who forced them to write those letters?Here is what the panel’s thought process must have been: For the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel led by attorney Nancy Ripperger, who by the way was stitched a clown suit by Zahnd’s legal team multiple times in the eight hours of testimony I observed: Here, Nancy, this recommendation of a reprimand is a “you tried hard” participation ribbon.You didn’t get the grand prize you asked for, which was a six month suspension of Zahnd’s license.I remember John Lennon’s Happy Christmas (War Is Over) playing on the darkroom radio over and over that Christmas season.Lennon’s tone matched my half mellow, half mad at the world mood at the time.
And please don’t try to be so forthcoming with information when the influential try to secretly influence the court system.Every day I would see sadness and loneliness on the face of my mother, widowed at the age of 45 and having never worked outside the home.As a 17-year-old kid I was trying to develop an idea of what I wanted to do with my life and where I wanted to do it, while at the same time doing my part after school, during the evenings and on the weekends to help keep the family business moving.Tell me again who is to blame for any shame they may have felt? Our courts are designed to operate in a public, transparent fashion.I’ve said it previously and I’ll repeat it here: if you are happy for anything less, that’s a dangerous attitude.
It’s not like Zahnd was giving away salacious details or talking about any letter writers’ family secrets in his press release.